4.4 Review

Environmental Factors and the Risk of Brain Tumours in Young People: A Systematic Review

Journal

NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 3-4, Pages 121-141

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000500601

Keywords

Brain tumours; Children; Risk factors; Brain cancer; Young adults

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 [226873, 603794]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Brain tumours (BT) are one of the most frequent tumour types in young people, although little is known about their risk factors. Objective: The objective of the current work was to review and summarize the scientific literature concerning exposure to environmental factors and BT risk in young people (<25 years old). Methods: PUBMED, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, IME-Biomedina (bibliographic database of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas) and Web of science databases were searched. A score to assess the quality of the methodological information was created. Results: Some possible associations between BT risk in young people were reported for cadmium, consumption of well water, presence of nitrate or nitrate-nitrogen in tap water, mother's passive smoking, air pollution, parental handling of pesticides at home and/or professional pesticide treatment within houses, living on a farm and/or with farm animals, some parental occupations and high amount of meat consumption. Conclusions: Although many of the studies reviewed suggest associations between the environmental exposures and BT in children and young adults, at present no reliable conclusion can be drawn as most results are based on small number of cases and exposure assessment is limited. Large-scale studies with better exposure assessment are needed to shed light on these possible associations, especially on exposure to heavy metals, tab water consumption, pesticides and parental smoking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available