4.7 Article

Separate Universe simulations with IllustrisTNG: baryonic effects on power spectrum responses and higher-order statistics

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 488, Issue 2, Pages 2079-2092

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1807

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2015-STG 678652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure power spectrum response functions in the presence of baryonic physical processes using separate universe simulations with the IllustrisTNG galaxy formation model. The response functions describe how the small-scale power spectrum reacts to long-wavelength perturbations and they can be efficiently measured with the separate universe technique by absorbing the effects of the long modes into a modified cosmology. Specifically, we focus on the total first-order matter power spectrum response to an isotropic density fluctuation R-1(k, z), which is fully determined by the logarithmic derivative of the non-linear matter power spectrum dlnP(m)(k, z)/dlnk and the growth-only response function G(1)(k, z). We find that G(1)(k, z) is not affected by the baryonic physical processes in the simulations at redshifts z < 3 and on all scales probed (k less than or similar to 15 h Mpc(-1); i.e. length scales greater than or similar to 0.4Mpc h(-1)). In practice, this implies that the power spectrum fully specifies the baryonic dependence of its response function. Assuming an idealized lensing survey set-up, we evaluate numerically the baryonic impact on the squeezed-lensing bispectrum and the lensing supersample power spectrum covariance, which are given in terms of responses. Our results show that these higher-order lensing statistics can display varying levels of sensitivity to baryonic effects compared to the power spectrum, with the squeezed bispectrum being the least sensitive. We also show that ignoring baryonic effects on lensing covariances slightly overestimates the error budget (and is therefore conservative from the point of view of parameter error bars) and likely has negligible impact on parameter biases in inference analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available