4.5 Article

Design, synthesis, antifungal activity, and structure-activity relationship studies of chalcones and hybrid dihydrochromane-chalcones

Journal

MOLECULAR DIVERSITY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 603-615

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-019-09967-y

Keywords

Botrytis cinerea; Monilinia fructicola; Fungicides; Chalcones; Dihydrochromane; 2D-QSAR

Funding

  1. CONICYT Programa Formacion de Capital Humano Avanzado [21130456]
  2. Postdoctoral Fondecyt grant [3180408]
  3. Vicerectoria de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso VRIEA-PUCV [37.0/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of ten chalcones (7a-j) and five new dihydrochromane-chalcone hybrids (7k-o) were synthesized and identified using spectroscopic techniques (IR, NMR, and MS). All compounds were evaluated in vitro against theB. cinereaandM. fructicolaphytopathogens that affect a wide range of crops of commercial interest. All compounds were tested against both phytopathogens using the mycelial growth inhibition test, and it was found that two and five compounds had similar activity to that of the positive control forB. cinerea(7a = 43.9,7c = 45.5, and Captan (R)= 24.8 mu g/mL) andM. fructicola(7a = 48.5,7d = 78.2,7e = 56.1,7f = 51.8,7n = 63.2, and Mystic (R)= 21.6 mu g/mL), respectively. To understand the key chalcone structural features for the antifungal activity onB. cinereaandM. fructicola, we developed structure-activity models with good statistical values (r(2)andq(2)higher than 0.8). ForB. cinerea, the hydrogen bonding donor and acceptor and the atomic charge on C(5)modulate the mycelial growth inhibition activity. In contrast, dipole moment and atomic charge on C(1 ')and the carbonyl carbon modify the inhibition activity forM. fructicola. These results allow the design of other compounds with activities superior to those of the compounds obtained in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available