4.8 Article

A Non-canonical Role of YAP/TEAD Is Required for Activation of Estrogen-Regulated Enhancers in Breast Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 791-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH-National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P30 CA054174]
  2. NIH Shared Instrument grant [1S10OD02180501]
  3. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Core Facility Award [RP160732]
  4. CPRIT [RR160017]
  5. V Foundation [V2016-017, DVP2019-018]
  6. Voelcker Fund Young Investigator Award
  7. UT Rising STARs Award
  8. Susan G. Komen CCR Award [CCR17483391]
  9. NCI [U54 CA217297/PRJ001]
  10. San Antonio Nathan Shock Center (National Institute on Aging [NIA]) [3P30 AG013319-23S2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

YAP/TEAD are nuclear effectors of the Hippo pathway, regulating organ size and tumorigenesis largely through promoter-associated function. However, their function as enhancer regulators remains poorly understood. Through an in vivo proximity-dependent labeling (BioID) technique, we identified YAP1 and TEAD4 protein as co-regulators of ER alpha on enhancers. The binding of YAP1/TEAD4 to ER alpha-bound enhancers is augmented upon E-2 stimulation and is required for the induction of E-2/ER alpha target genes and E-2-induced oncogenic cell growth. Furthermore, their enhancer binding is a prerequisite for enhancer activation marked by eRNA transcription and for the recruitment of the enhancer activation machinery component MED1. The binding of TEAD4 on active ERE-containing enhancers is independent of its DNA-binding behavior, and instead, occurs through protein-tethering trans-binding. Our data reveal a non-canonical function of YAP1 and TEAD4 as ER alpha cofactors in regulating cancer growth, highlighting the potential of YAP/TEAD as possible actionable drug targets for ER alpha(+) breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available