4.7 Article

Automated segmentation of macular edema in OCT using deep neural networks

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 216-227

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.05.002

Keywords

Macular edema segmentation; Deep neural networks; Atrous convolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61432012, U1435213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macular edema is an eye disease that can affect visual acuity. Typical disease symptoms include subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelium detachment (PED). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been widely used for diagnosing macular edema because of its non-invasive and high resolution properties. Segmentation for macular edema lesions from OCT images plays an important role in clinical diagnosis. Many computer-aided systems have been proposed for the segmentation. Most traditional segmentation methods used in these systems are based on low-level hand-crafted features, which require significant domain knowledge and are sensitive to the variations of lesions. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper proposes to use deep neural networks (DNNs) together with atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) to automatically segment the SRF and PED lesions. Lesions-related features are first extracted by DNNs, then processed by ASPP which is composed of multiple atrous convolutions with different fields of view to accommodate the various scales of the lesions. Based on ASPP, a novel module called stochastic ASPP (sASPP) is proposed to combat the co-adaptation of multiple atrous convolutions. A large OCT dataset provided by a competition platform called AI Challenger are used to train and evaluate the proposed model. Experimental results demonstrate that the DNNs together with ASPP achieve higher segmentation accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art method. The stochastic operation added in sASPP is empirically verified as an effective regularization method that can alleviate the overfitting problem and significantly reduce the validation error. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available