4.7 Article

Distinct subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma defined by hypermutated genes

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 2662-2672

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-019-0509-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Cancer Foundations
  4. Helsinki University Hospital
  5. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  6. University of Helsinki graduate program
  7. Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease whose personalized clinical management requires robust molecular stratification. Here, we show that somatic hypermutation (SHM) patterns constitute a marker for DLBCL molecular classification. The activity of SHM mutational processes delineated the cell of origin (COO) in DLBCL. Expression of the herein identified 36 SHM target genes stratified DLBCL into four novel SHM subtypes. In a meta-analysis of patients with DLBCL treated with immunochemotherapy, the SHM subtypes were significantly associated with overall survival (1642 patients) and progression-free survival (795 patients). Multivariate analysis of survival indicated that the prognostic impact of the SHM subtypes is independent from the COO classification and the International Prognostic Index. Furthermore, the SHM subtypes had a distinct clinical outcome within each of the COO subtypes, and strikingly, even within unclassified DLBCL. The genetic landscape of the four SHM subtypes indicated unique associations with driver alterations and oncogenic signaling in DLBCL, which suggests a possibility for therapeutic exploitation. These findings provide a biologically driven classification system in DLBCL with potential clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available