4.7 Article

Photoelectrocatalytic degradation Rhodamine B over highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays photoelectrode

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.155

Keywords

TiO2 nanotube arrays; Nanotube length; Photoelectrocatalytic; RhB degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507104]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different nanotube length of TiO2 nanotube arrays (NTAs) electrodes were successfully prepared by anodization method with different duration time. The as-prepared electrodes were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Mott-Shottky measurement. The influence of bias potential, illumination and nanotube length on Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation was investigated. The results show that applied bias potential and short nanotube length are beneficial to RhB degradation due to the enhanced charge transfer. Moreover, it is found that an induction period exists in the RhB photoelectrodegradation with short nanotube length and the rate is sensitive to the carriers concentration. This can be attributed to the increased effective holes for degradation RhB and the decreased recombination rate of electrons-holes. Nevertheless, RhB photoelectrodegradation with long nanotube length didnt display the similar kinetic characteristic. The possible explanation is that long nanotube length increases the recombination rate of electrons-holes and limits the charge transfer, hence decreases the amount of effectively charge carriers. This may decrease the degradation rate and thus result in the disappearing of the second degradation constant. Moreover, we further demonstrate our deduction by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Mott-Shottky measurement. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available