4.7 Article

Mutational landscape of gastric cancer and clinical application of genomic profiling based on target next-generation sequencing

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1941-0

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Next-generation sequencing; Tumor mutation burden; Clinical actionable alterations

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Health and Family Planning Committee [201640017]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX09304030]
  3. Major Projects of Special Development Funds in Zhangjiang National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai [ZJ2017-ZD-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths, and an increased number of GC patients adopt to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify tumor genomic alterations for precision medicine.MethodsIn this study, we established a hybridization capture-based NGS panel including 612 cancer-associated genes, and collected sequencing data of tumors and matched bloods from 153 gastric cancer patients. We performed comprehensive analysis of these sequencing and clinical data.Results35 significantly mutated genes were identified such as TP53, AKAP9, DRD2, PTEN, CDH1, LRP2 et al. Among them, 29 genes were novel significantly mutated genes compared with TCGA study. TP53 is the top frequently mutated gene, and tends to mutate in male (p=0.025) patients and patients whose tumor located in cardia (p=0.011). High tumor mutation burden (TMB) gathered in TP53 wild-type tumors (p=0.045). TMB was also significantly associated with DNA damage repair (DDR) genes genotype (p=0.047), Lauren classification (p=1.5e-5), differentiation (1.9e-7), and HER2 status (p=0.023). 38.31% of gastric cancer patients harbored at least one actionable alteration according to OncoKB database.ConclusionsWe drew a comprehensive mutational landscape of 153 gastric tumors and demonstrated utility of target next-generation sequencing to guide clinical management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available