4.5 Review

Cerebral Vascular Toxicity of Antiretroviral Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNE PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 74-89

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11481-019-09858-x

Keywords

Antiretroviral therapy; Blood-brain barrier; Cerebrovascular toxicity; Mitochondria; Neurotoxicity

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [16POST31170002] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL126559, R01 HL126559] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [DA040537, R01 DA044579, DA044579, DA039576, R01 DA050528, R01 DA039576] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH098891, R01 MH072567, R01 MH128022, MH072567] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HIV infection is associated with comorbidities likely driven by HIV and long-term use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Antiretroviral drugs used for HIV treatment can have toxic effects, particularly on the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Balancing health risks and gains of ART is crucial for maximizing therapy's positive effects.
HIV infection is associated with comorbidities that are likely to be driven not only by HIV itself, but also by the toxicity of long-term use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Indeed, increasing evidence demonstrates that the antiretroviral drugs used for HIV treatment have toxic effects resulting in various cellular and tissue pathologies. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a modulated anatomophysiological interface which separates and controls substance exchange between the blood and the brain parenchyma; therefore, it is particularly exposed to ART-induced toxicity. Balancing the health risks and gains of ART has to be considered in order to maximize the positive effects of therapy. The current review discusses the cerebrovascular toxicity of ART, with the focus on mitochondrial dysfunction. Graphical representation of the interactions between HIV, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available