4.7 Article

Effect of the leachate head on the key pollutant indicator in a municipal solid waste landfill barrier system

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 262-270

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.065

Keywords

Municipal solid waste landfill; Leachate head; Pollutant indicator; Breakthrough time; Barrier system

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China ('973' Program) [2012CB719804]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013ZX07113001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170501]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640527]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In previous studies of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill barrier systems, chemical oxygen demand has been found to be the key pollutant indicator when estimating the breakthrough time for. However, the leachate head in a municipal solid waste landfill can be very high (> 10 m in some Chinese landfills). The key pollutant indicator could be different at different leachate heads. The leachate head will continuously change during the use of a landfill. Different pollutants have different transport characteristics in the leachate, so it is necessary to determine whether changes in the leachate head change the key pollutant indicator for identifying breakthrough in a landfill barrier system. In this study, numerical models were used to investigate transport of common leachate pollutants through four typical landfill barrier systems with different leachate heads. Chemical oxygen demand reached the breakthrough threshold before the other pollutants, irrespective of (1) the leachate head and (2) changes in the leachate head. It was therefore clear that the leachate head did not affect the selection of the key pollutant indicator for identifying breakthrough in a landfill barrier system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available