4.6 Article

Resistance Risk Evaluated by Metaflumizone Selection and the Effects on Toxicities Over Other Insecticides in Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages 2354-2361

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz171

Keywords

Spodoptera exigua; metaflumizone; insecticide resistance; cross-resistance; resistance risk assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31272063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metaflumizone is a novel semicarbazone insecticide. It functions as a sodium channel blocker insecticide (SCBI) with excellent insecticidal activity on most economically important lepidopterous pests. This study assessed the resistance risk of Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to metaflumizone in the laboratory and the effects of metaflumizone selection on toxicities to other insecticides. Spodoptera exigua collected from a field population at Huizhou in 2012 were successively challenged by metaflumizone to evaluate the risk of resistance evolution. Twelve generations of selection increased resistance to metaflumizone by 3.4-fold and threshold trait analysis revealed that the realized heritability (h(2)) of this resistance was 0.086. When h(2) was equal to 0.086 and 90% of individuals were killed at each generation, LC50 to metaflumizone increased by 10-fold after 15 generations. The selection by metaflumizone did not increase the resistance to indoxacarb, chlorantraniliprole, spinosad, methomyl, or endosulfan, suggesting a lack of cross-resistance. However, metaflumizone challenge upheld the recession of resistance to emamectin benzoate, chlorfluazuron, and tebufenozide. The block of resistance drops by metaflumizone exposure implied a possible cross-resistance between metaflumizone and these three insecticides. These results contribute to integrated resistance management of S. exigua.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available