4.6 Article

Comparison of periodontitis patients' classification in the 2018 versus 1999 classification

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 908-917

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13157

Keywords

periodontal diagnostic; periodontal therapy; periodontitis; tooth loss; treatment planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We aimed to assess how the 2018 and 1999 classifications of periodontal diseases reflect (a) patients' characteristics, (b) disease severity/extent/progression and (c) tooth loss (TL) during observation period. Methods A total of 251 patients were followed over 21.8 +/- 6.2 years. For the 1999 classification, using clinical attachment level (CAL), patients were classified as localized/generalized, mild/moderate/severe and aggressive/chronic periodontitis. For the 2018 classification, patients were staged according to their CAL or bone loss (BL) and the number of lost teeth (stages I-IV). Further factors like probing pocket depths (PPD) or furcation involvement modified the stage. The extent was sub-classified as generalized/localized. Patients were graded according to the BL/age index, smoking and/or diabetes. Results According to the 1999 classification, most patients suffered from generalized severe chronic periodontitis (203/251) or generalized aggressive periodontitis (45/251). Patients with aggressive periodontitis were younger and less often female or smokers. They showed similar TL (0.25 +/- 0.22 teeth/patient*year) as generalized severe chronic periodontitis patients (0.23 +/- 0.25 teeth/patient*year). According to the 2018 classification, most patients were classified as generalized III-C (140/251), III-B (31/251) or IV-C (64/251). Patients' age, smoking status, CAL, PPD and BL were well reflected. TL differed between IV-C (0.36 +/- 0.47), generalized III-C (0.21 +/- 0.24) and localized forms (0.10-0.15). Conclusions Patients' characteristics, disease severity/extent/progression and TL were well reflected by the 2018 classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available