4.7 Article

Controllable synthesis and efficient photocatalytic activity of BiOF nanodisks exposed with {101} facets, instead of {001} facets

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 794, Issue -, Pages 127-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.239

Keywords

{101} facets; [101] and [001]; Surface oxygen vacancy; BiOF; Photocatalysis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21377060]
  2. Project of Science and Technology Infrastructure of Jiangsu [BM201380277]
  3. Key Project of Environmental Protection Program of Jiangsu [2013005]
  4. Jiangsu province graduate training innovation project [SJCX17_0262, SJZZ16_0153, KYCX17_0894, KYCX17_0895]
  5. Jiangsu province undergraduate practice and innovation project [201810300043Z, 201810300240]
  6. Six Talent Climax Foundation of Jiangsu [20100292]
  7. 333 Outstanding Youth Scientist Foundation of Jiangsu [20112015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

So far, BiOF nanodisks exposed with {101} facets have not been reported. In this work, BiOF mainly exposed with {101} facets, instead of common {001} facets, are synthesized at different pH values via a simple hydrothermal method. It is interesting that BiOF thick rectangular plates and thin round nanodisks are formed through the growth preferential along [001] and [101] directions, respectively. On the base of layered crystallography structure, the preferential growth along [001] direction favors to form a thick multi-layered structure, whereas [101] direction for a thin fewer-layered structure. Moreover, more surface oxygen vacancies are contained in thin nanodisks, which reduces the band gap and improves charge transfer and separation. As a result, BiOF round nanodisks show an activity 7.9 times higher than rectangular plates for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under ultraviolet light irradiation (lambda <= 400 nm). (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available