4.7 Article

Symptomatic HIV CNS viral escape among patients on effective cART

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 39-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.03.033

Keywords

Symptomatic CNS escape; HIV viral escape CNS; Cerebral penetration effectiveness score; Cognitive decline HIV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The clinical syndrome in symptomatic HIV associated CNS viral escape is poorly defined. We attempted to describe the clinical syndrome, laboratory profile, radiological features and outcomes of HIV infected patients with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) viral escape in our study. Methods: This is a retrospective study were adult patients with HIV infection on cART admitted with a diagnosis of CD8 encephalitis or CNS viral escape in a large teaching hospital in South India was identified. Results: The mean age of the eleven patients included in the study was 37.5 years. Most patients had received almost a decade of antiretroviral treatment at diagnosis (mean: 11.18 years). All patients presented with global cerebral syndrome. Cognitive decline, tremors, and headaches were common manifestations. All patients had lymphocytic pleocytosis (mean cell count: 44.63 cells/ml; lymphocyte percentage: 94.81%) with elevated protein (mean: 125.36 mg/dl). All patients were on boosted protease inhibitors (81.8% on Atazanavir and 18.18% Lopinavir). All except one patient was on Tenofovir and lamivudine combination therapy. White matter changes and deep brain nuclei involvement were common. Most patients required a change of cART to regimens with better CNS penetration and suppression of the resistant virus in the plasma and improved. Conclusion: CNS viral escape should be considered as a differential among patients on Atazanavir presenting with non-focal cerebral syndrome and CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available