4.1 Article

Static and evolutionary allometry in the Italian endemic ant species Cataglyphis italica (Emery 1906)

Journal

ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 16-28

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2019.1639080

Keywords

Cataglyphis italica; allometry; adaptation; Hymenoptera; Formicidae

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allometry is defined as differential growth of various body parts at distinct rates. Traditionally, two types of allometries have been studied in holometabolous insects: evolutionary and static. Polymorphic ants can represent a good model to study these two types of allometry. In this work, we investigated both static and evolutionary allometry in Cataglyphis species, focusing on the Italian endemic taxon Cataglyphis italica. We assessed: (i) the intracolonial size variability in C. italica; (ii) the allometric relationships between body size, head size and leg size in C. italica; (iii) evolutionary allometry in the Cataglyphis genus, by comparing the ratio of metafemur length to mesosoma length (a measure of body size) across nine species originated from two colonization routes: northern (from Asia to Europe) and southern (from Asia to North Africa). We found some evidence of allometric growth between body parts in workers of C. italica, particularly between body size and head size. Furthermore, in line with previous studies, we also found some evidence in support of evolutionary allometry in the Cataglyphis genus. Specifically, species originating in North Africa displayed significantly higher ratios of metafemur length (MFL) to mesosoma length (ML) than species originating in Europe, whereas the two groups of species did not differ with respect to MFL and ML. So, this result is consistent with the hypothesis that the evolution of longer legs relative to body size is an adaptation to more arid environmental conditions, allowing ants to optimize foraging efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available