4.8 Article

LncRNA HAND2-AS1 promotes liver cancer stem cell self-renewal via BMP signaling

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 38, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018101110

Keywords

BMP signaling; cancer stem cells; HAND2-AS1; hepatocellular carcinoma; INO80 complex

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19050301, XDA12020219, XDB19030203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91640203, 31530093, 81872413, 81672897, 81602247, 81572433, 81772646, 31601189]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7181006, 7162125]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent liver cancer, characterized by a high rate of recurrence and heterogeneity. Liver cancer stem cells (CSCs) may well contribute to both of these pathological properties, but the mechanism underlying their self-renewal maintenance is poorly understood. Here, we identified a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) termed HAND2-AS1 that is highly expressed in liver CSCs. Human HAND2-AS1 and its mouse ortholog lncHand2 display a high level of conservation. HAND2-AS1 is required for the self-renewal maintenance of liver CSCs to initiate HCC development. Mechanistically, HAND2-AS1 recruits the INO80 chromatin-remodeling complex to the promoter of BMPR1A, thereby inducing its expression and leading to the activation of BMP signaling. Importantly, interfering with expression of HAND2-AS1 by antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and BMPR1A by siRNAs has synergistic anti-tumorigenic effects on humanized HCC models. Moreover, knockout of lncHand2 or Bmpr1a in mouse hepatocytes impairs BMP signaling and suppresses the initiation of liver cancer. Our findings reveal that HAND2-AS1 promotes the self-renewal of liver CSCs and drives liver oncogenesis, offering a potential new target for HCC therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available