4.6 Article

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization improves survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

EJSO
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 2188-2196

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.031

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Microvascular invasion; Hepatic resection; TACE; Systematic review and meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81730097]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [81521091]
  3. Chang Jiang Scholars Program (2013) of China Ministry of Education
  4. National Key Basic Research Program 973 project [2015CB554000]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602523]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [SHDC12015106]
  7. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [134119a0200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The benefits of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) remain controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant TACE and hepatic resection (HR) alone for HCC patients with MVI. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched to compare adjuvant TACE and HR alone for the treatment of HCC with MVI from inception to January 1, 2019. The study outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were extracted independently by two authors. Results: 12 trials involving 2190 patients were evaluated. A meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR = 0.33, P < 0.001; OR = 0.49, P < 0.001; and OR= 0.59, P <0.01; respectively), favored adjuvant TACE over HR alone. 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis of DFS, and adjuvant TACE showed better 1-, 3-, and 5-DFS (OR= 0.45, P < 0.001; OR= 0.50, P < 0.001; and OR 0.58, P < 0.001; respectively) compared to HR alone. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that adjuvant TACE could benefit HCC patients with MVI with tumor diameter >5 cm or multinodular tumors. Conclusion: Adjuvant TACE may improve OS and DFS for HCC patients with MVI compared to HR alone and should be recommended for selected HCC patients with MVI. However, these results need to be validated through further high-quality clinical studies. Lay summary: The benefits of adjuvant TACE in HCC patients with microvascular invasion remain controversial. Twelve studies involving 2190 patients were include in our meta-analysis. Adjuvant TACE may improve OS and DFS for HCC patients with MVI compared to HR alone and should be recommended for selected HCC patients with MVI. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO - The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available