4.7 Article

A multi-UAV clustering strategy for reducing insecure communication range

Journal

COMPUTER NETWORKS
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 132-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2019.04.028

Keywords

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); Multi-UAV; Group communication; Cooperative control; Secure communication

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [61701322]
  2. Key Projects of Liaoning Natural Science Foundation [20170540700]
  3. Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Science Foundation [1201630]
  4. Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Innovation Person Foundation [2018059]
  5. Naval Research Institute Innovation Foundation [NA-Z201801-JJ0-TQ009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight formations can be deployed to monitor large areas. Individual UAVs communicate and exchange information while formation flying. but, such communication presents a security risk. The area between the UAV group range and the group communication range is called the insecurity range and in this region multi-UAV communication can cause serious information leakage. To resolve this problem, this paper considers two aspects, namely, cooperative control and secure communication. To implement cooperative control, a clustering algorithm is presented to accelerate the speed at which the multi-UAV formation converges. By setting the flight control factor to accelerate the convergence of multi-UAV, the UAV group forms a flock. To facilitate secure communication, the hierarchical virtual communication ring (HVCR) strategy is deployed to reduce the boundary of group communication and minimize the insecure range. The effectiveness of the clustering algorithm and HVCR strategy is demonstrated via theoretical analysis and experiments. In the case of 50 and 100 nodes, the results show that the clustering algorithm can facilitate multi-UAV group flocks. In the case of 25, 30, 35 and 40 nodes, the HVCR strategy can reduce the relative size of the insecure range to 65.33%, 62.95%, 61.50% and 60.55%, respectively. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available