4.7 Article

A FFT solver for variational phase-field modeling of brittle fracture

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.017

Keywords

Phase-field model; FFT method; Brittle fracture; Fixed-point algorithm

Funding

  1. European Union (European Regional Development Fund, ERDF/FEDER)
  2. Hauts-de-France Region Council by CISIT project (POPCOM action)
  3. French state

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The variational phase-field method is an attractive non-local approach of modeling fracture in heterogeneous materials. However, these materials usually require a fine mesh to resolve the fracture process zone. Consequently, the standard finite element solver becomes cumbersome due to the large number of elements in applications with highly heterogeneous materials. Motivated by this limitation, an algorithm based on FFT methods has been introduced in this paper to solve the phase-field model of brittle fracture. Relying on a staggered update scheme, the proposed algorithm solves the fracture problem and mechanical problem separately, both using the FFT technique. It inherits the advantages of classical FFT methods in terms of simplicity of mesh generation and parallel implementation. Introduced within a FFT-based code AMITEX, it takes the advantage of massively parallel capabilities associated with a distributed memory implementation. The characteristics of the proposed method are analyzed in a single edge notched specimen benchmark. Representative numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed FFT solver is capable of predicting different crack modes and complex crack configuration, such as crack interaction, branching and coalescence. Finally, a model of an idealized continuous fiber composite with void involving over 32 million voxels is solved, illustrating the potential of the FFT solver in large-scale problems. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available