4.7 Article

Production of 3D printed polylactide scaffolds with surface grafted hydrogel coatings

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 136-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.069

Keywords

Hydrogels; Polyvinylpyrrolidone; Surface modification; Scaffolds; 3D printing

Funding

  1. project: Patient-specific bioactive, antimicrobial PLA-PGA/titanium implants for large jawbone defects after tumour resection - jawIMPLANT. NCBR/EC. M-ERA.NET Call 2016 [M-ERA.NET2/2016/05/2017]
  2. Manufacturing of polymer-ceramic implants using 3D printing - Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Dean's grant [PSP 504/04057/1070/42.000100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to elaborate the 3D printed polylactide (PLA) polymeric scaffolds and, subsequently, study the possibility of coating thereof with a biomedical polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) hydrogel through the previously patented protocol. Such materials have a potential to be applied in biomedical engineering, e.g. for tissue regeneration. PVP layer according to the present paper could constitute a useful biocompatible supporting layer for drug delivering implant surfaces of any shape. Polylactide (PLA) both in forms of flat foils and 3D printed scaffolds was used to be coated with PVP layer with the Fenton-type reaction that enables the polymeric scaffold grafting with hydrogel in two easy steps. The study revealed that PVP was successfully grafted to PLA substrates. Most optimal parameters for PVP grafting process were selected. The PLA-PVP materials were found to be hydrophilic and non-toxic which is promising considering their biomedical application. The method comprising well-tested PLA scaffolds printing and then grafting them with PVP layer has a promising potential to be brought in to the industrial production due to its simplicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available