4.3 Article

Timeliness of Treatment Initiation in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Breast Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages E27-E35

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.009

Keywords

Hormone therapy; Surgery; Timeliness benchmark; Time-to-surgery; Treatment delay

Categories

Funding

  1. Komen for the Cure Health Disparities Training Grant
  2. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute NIH CTSA award [UL1TR002544]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study analyzed timeliness of care at Tufts Medical Center between 2009 and 2015. Most patients met the 45-day surgery and the 1-year hormone therapy benchmarks. Knowledge of reasons for treatment delay, including clinical complexity and logistical/financial issues, may allow targeting interventions for patients at greatest risk of care delays. Background: Evidence-based timeliness benchmarks have been established to assess quality of breast cancer care, as delays in treatment are associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated how current breast cancer care meets these benchmarks and what factors may delay the timely initiation of treatment. Patients and Methods: Demographic and disease characteristics of 377 newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer who initiated treatment at Tufts Medical Center (2009-2015) were extracted from electronic medical records. Time from diagnosis to initial surgery and time from diagnosis to initiation of hormone therapy were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with treatment delays. Thematic analysis was performed to categorize reasons for delay. Results: Of 319 patients who had surgery recommended as the first treatment, 248 (78%) met the 45-day benchmark (median, 28 days; 25th-75th %, 19-43). After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable regression analysis revealed that negative hormone receptor status (odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-8.43) and mastectomy (odds ratio, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-8.06) were significantly associated with delays in surgery. Delays were mostly owing to clinical complexity or logistical/financial reasons. Of 241 patients eligible for hormone therapy initiation, 232 (96%) met the 1-year benchmark (median, 147 days; 25th-75th %, 79-217). Conclusion: Most patients met timeliness guidelines for surgery and initiation of hormone therapy, although risk factors for delay were identified. Knowledge of reasons for breast cancer treatment delay, including clinical complexity and logistical/financial issues, may allow targeting interventions for patients at greatest risk of care delays. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available