4.7 Article

Analysis of physiological responses and expression profiling of boron transporter-like genes in response to excess boron in Populus russkii

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages 369-378

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.130

Keywords

Poplar; Boron transporter; Tolerance; Detoxification; Compartmentation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500498, 31770644]
  2. Project of Innovation Research Team in Sichuan Education Administration [13TD0023]
  3. Longshan Academic Talent Research Supporting Program of SWUST [17LZX628, 17LZX327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poplars (Populus species) are tolerant to boron (B) toxicity and have phytoremediation potential in B-contaminated soils. However, the detoxification strategy is largely unknown. To screen the key B transporter-like (BOR-like) genes for B compartmentation, Populus russkii plants were exposed to different levels of excess B and the plant growth, physiological responses, B distribution, and the expression patterns of BOR-like genes were characterized. P. russkii showed moderate tolerance to excess B although the plant growth was inhibited. The enhanced proline level and well-regulated antioxidant defense system were associated with B tolerance in leaves. The B absorbed by plants was predominantly allocated to leaves. Ten BOR-like genes were identified and seven of them showed tissue-specific expression patterns. PrBOR7 was identified as an important BOR-like gene possibly involved in the export of B from leaf cytoplasm because it was expressed specifically in leaves and induced by excess B. Yeast experiment assays verified that PrBOR7 functions as an efflux-type transporter and strongly improved cell tolerance to excess B. The expression patterns of BOR-like genes highlight the diversity of the family members in P. russkii, and PrBOR7 has potential as a candidate gene for B detoxification. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available