4.7 Article

Self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for electrochemical mineralization of phenols

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 329-339

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.135

Keywords

Ti3+; TiO2 nanotubes; Anode material; Electrochemical oxidation; Mineralization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51778281, 51408297, 51402151]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Fund [BK20171342, BK20161493]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China, P.R. China [51438008]
  4. Qinglan Project, Jiangsu Province
  5. Zijin Intelligent Program, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30917011309]
  7. Nanjing normal university scientific research startup fund [184080H202B146]
  8. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Open Fund [PCRRF18018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays (DNTA) were prepared for the electrooxidation of resistant organics. The anatase TiO2 NTAs had an improved carrier density and conductivity from Ti3+ doping, and the oxygen-evolution potential remained at a high value of 2.48 V versus the standard hydrogen electrode, and thus, achieved a highly enhanced removal efficiency of phenol. The second anodization could stabilize Ti3+ and improve the performance by removing surface TiO2 particles. Improper preparation parameters (i.e., a short anodization time, a high calcination temperature and cathodization current density) harmed the electrooxidation activity. Although boron-doped diamond (BDD) anodes performed best in removing phenol, DNTA exhibited a higher mineralization of phenol than Pt/Ti and BDD at 120 min because intermediates were oxidized once they are produced with DNTA. Mechanism investigations using reagents such as tert-butanol, oxalic acid, terephthalic acid, and coumarin showed that the DNTA mineralization resulted mainly from surface-bound (OH)-O-center dot, and the DNTA produced more than twice the amount of center dot OH compared with BDD. The free (OH)-O-center dot on the BDD electrode was more conducive to initial substrate oxidation, whereas the adsorbed (OH)-O-center dot on the DNTA electrode mineralized the organics in situ. The preferential removal of p-substituted phenols on DNTA was attributed mainly to their electromigration and the aromatic intermediates that are hydrophobic were beneficial to mineralization. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available