4.6 Article

MIL-53(Al) as a Versatile Platform for Ionic-Liquid/MOF Composites to Enhance CO2 Selectivity over CH4 and N2

Journal

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 20, Pages 3655-3667

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201900634

Keywords

adsorption; CO2 separation; gas separation; ionic liquids; metal-organic frameworks

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [114R093]
  2. Koc University TUPRAS Energy Center (KUTEM)
  3. Koc University Surface Science and Technology Center (KUYTAM)
  4. Koc University Seed Fund Program
  5. TUBA-GEBIP Award
  6. TARLA
  7. ERC-2017-Starting Grant
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [756489-COSMOS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five different imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) were incorporated into a metal-organic framework (MOF), MIL-53(Al), to investigate the effect of IL incorporation on the CO2 separation performance of MIL-53(Al). CO2, CH4, and N-2 adsorption isotherms of the IL/MIL-53(Al) composites and pristine MIL-53(Al) were measured to evaluate the effect of the ILs on the CO2/CH4 and CO2/N-2 selectivities of the MOF. Of the composite materials that were tested, [BMIM][PF6]/MIL-53(Al) exhibited the largest increase in CO2/CH4 selectivity, 2.8-times higher than that of pristine MIL-53(Al), whilst [BMIM][MeSO4]/MIL-53(Al) exhibited the largest increase in CO2/N-2 selectivity, 3.3-times higher than that of pristine MIL-53(Al). A comparison of the CO2 separation potentials of the IL/MOF composites showed that the [BMIM][BF4]- and [BMIM][PF6]-incorporated MIL-53(Al) composites both showed enhanced CO2/N-2 and CO2/CH4 selectivities at pressures of 1-5 bar compared to composites of CuBTC and ZIF-8 with the same ILs. These results demonstrate that MIL-53(Al) is a versatile platform for IL/MOF composites and could help to guide the rational design of new composites for target gas-separation applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available