4.8 Article

Controlling Size, Defectiveness, and Fluorescence in Nanoparticle UiO-66 through Water and Ligand Modulation

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 13, Pages 4831-4839

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01383

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P20GM104316]
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC0206CH11357]
  3. NASA [NNX15AI19H]
  4. NASA [NNX15AI19H, 803621] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UiO-66, a zirconium(IV) metal-organic framework composed of six-metal clusters and terephthalic acid ligands, displays excellent thermal and chemical stability and has functions in gas storage, catalysis, selective adsorption, and drug delivery. Though the stability of UiO-66 is highly advantageous, simultaneous synthetic control over particle size and defectiveness of UiO-66 remains difficult to attain. Using an acid-free solvothermal synthesis, we demonstrate that particle size, defectiveness, and inherent fluorescence of UiO-66 can be precisely tuned using the molar ligand-to-metal ratio, quantified water content, and reaction time during synthesis. These three synthetic handles allow for reproducible modulation of UiO-66 defectiveness between 0 and 12% and particle size between 20 and 120 nm, while maintaining high crystallinity in the nanoparticles that were formed. We also find that particle defectiveness is linked to common overestimation of particle size measurements obtained via dynamic light scattering and propose a model to correct elevated hydrodynamic diameter measurements. Finally, we report inherent fluorescence of nonfunctionalized UiO-66, which exhibits peak fluorescence at a wavelength of 390 nm following excitation at 280 nm and is maximized in large, defect-free particles. Overall, this synthetic approach and characterization of defect, size, and fluorescence represent new opportunities to tune the physiochemical properties of UiO-66.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available