4.0 Article

Hormonal contraceptive use in Australian women: Who is using what?

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13021

Keywords

combined oral contraceptive; hormonal contraception; long-acting reversible contraceptive

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In Australia many hormonal contraceptives are not Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) supported, hence the use of different formulations have not been quantified. Objectives To document the use of hormonal contraceptives and factors associated with their use. Materials and methods Cross-sectional, online questionnaire-based study of 6986 Australian women, aged 18-39 years, recruited by email invitation from two large, representative databases. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of use of hormonal contraceptives and associated socio-demographic characteristics. Results Of the 6600 potential hormone contraceptive users, 43.2% were current users. Most (63.6%) reported using a combined oral contraceptive (COC) of which 30.9% were non-PBS-supported anti-androgenic progestin-containing COCs. Use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) or an injectable contraceptive was reported by 26.8%. Education beyond secondary school, being Australian born, rural residency, normal body mass index, age COC (P < 0.0001) and endometriosis was significantly associated with intrauterine system (IUS) use. Third or fourth generation COC use was reported by 12.1% of obese, current smokers. Conclusion An estimated one-third of Australian women aged 18-39 are taking a non-PBS-supported anti-androgenic progestin COC, highlighting inequity in access to COC options. That hormonal contraceptive use is higher in rural areas is a novel finding and the proportion of LARC or injectable use suggests that uptake in Australia is higher than previously reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available