4.8 Article

Hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) over mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst prepared by an EDTA-assisted impregnation method

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 179-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.023

Keywords

Hydrogen production; Steam reforming of LNG; Ni/Al2O3 catalyst; EDTA-assisted impregnation method

Funding

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System - National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea [20110031575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mesoporous alumina (denoted as MA) support was prepared by an epoxide-driven sol-gel method. A mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was then prepared via impregnation of Ni(EDTA)(2-) complex anions onto positively-charged mesoporous alumina support (denoted as NiE/MA). For comparison, a mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was also prepared by introducing nickel species onto MA support via conventional impregnation method (denoted as Ni/MA). Both NiE/MA and Ni/MA catalysts were applied to the hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in order to investigate the effect of preparation method on the catalytic performance. Ni/MA catalyst retained relatively large amount of nickel species in the form of bulk nickel oxide, which were weakly bound to alumina support compared to NiE/MA catalyst. It was found that the reduced NiE/MA catalyst showed smaller metallic nickel particle size and higher nickel dispersion than the reduced Ni/MA catalyst, implying that NiE/MA catalyst retained stronger resistance toward nickel sintering than Ni/MA catalyst during the reduction process. It was also revealed that methane adsorption capacity of the reduced NiE/MA catalyst was larger than that of the reduced Ni/MA catalyst. NiE/MA catalyst with larger methane adsorption capacity exhibited better catalytic performance than Ni/MA catalyst in the hydrogen production by steam reforming of LNG. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available