4.8 Article

Correlation of the composition of biominerals with their ability of stimulating intracellular DNA sensors and inflammatory cytokines

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 106-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.013

Keywords

Gene therapy; Implant rejection; Intracellular DNA sensors; Vaccines; Cancer therapy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21EB007494]
  2. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [0748285]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0748285] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biominerals (or microcalcification) deposited in soft tissues are associated with a number of pathogeneses and cancer progressions. Biominerals have also shown promise for DNA delivery and tissue engineering. Biominerals themselves may stimulate NALP3 inflammasomes, and DNA delivered by biominerals can potentially engage with intracellular DNA sensors, resulting in unwanted inflammatory responses. In this study, a library of biominerals doped with or without DNA is formed through surface-induced biomineralization. It is demonstrated that empty biominerals stimulate NALP3 inflammasomes and induce the production of IL-1 beta. They are also able to activate mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and induce inflammatory cytokines, i.e. IL-6. DNA delivered by biominerals escapes the detection of TLR9, but activates DAI and inflammasomes. Furthermore, it is shown that the level of both IL-1 beta and IL-6 is correlated with the composition of biominerals, in particular the ratio of Mg(Sr) to Ca, and the pH sensitivity of biominerals. These results provide insights into the design of safe and effective DNA delivery systems and biocompatible implants as well as the understanding of the pathogeneses of biominerals deposited in soft tissues. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available