4.8 Article

Photoelectrochemical water oxidation over fibrous and sponge-like BiVO4/β-Bi4V2O11 photoanodes fabricated by spray pyrolysis

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 247-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.034

Keywords

Water oxidation; Heterojunction; Semiconductor; Photoanodes

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. FAPEMIG Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two different heterojunction photoanodes were made by one-pot spray pyrolysis deposition of BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 directly onto a conductive FTO substrate or on a previously deposited SnO2 layer onto an FTO substrate (sample BiVO4/Bi4V2O11/SnO2). The direct deposition onto FTO produced fibrous-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11, whereas the deposition onto SnO2 gave sponge-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 morphologies. The photoactivity of these photoelectrodes was investigated for photoelectrochemical water oxidation under visible light irradiation. The fibrous-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 exhibited higher photoactivity than that of the sponge-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11/SnO2 film. The transient photocurrent decay studies revealed that the time of e(-)/h(+) recombination is higher in fibrous-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 than sponge-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11/SnO2 film, which suggests that the electrons might accumulate in the SnO2 layer, thus causing a higher e(-)/h(+) recombination and a lower photoactivity. Electrochemical impedance data showed that the hole transfer from the semiconductor to the water takes place more readily in fibrous-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 than sponge-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11/SnO2 films. Consequently, the overall photoelectrochemical cell efficiencies for fibrous-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11 and sponge-like BiVO4/Bi4V2O11/SnO2 films were 0.14 and 0.11%, respectively, without using oxygen evolution catalysts. These photoanodes prepared by spray pyrolysis are thus promising for use in PEC water splitting cells. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available