4.4 Article

Association of LIM Domain 7 Gene Polymorphisms and Plasma Levels of LIM Domain 7 with Dilated Cardiomyopathy in a Chinese Population

Journal

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 3, Pages 885-897

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-016-2368-1

Keywords

DCM; LMO7; Ubiquitin-proteasome system(UPS); SNP; Survival analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270289, 81300170]
  2. Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of Sichuan Province [2012HH0032]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110181110011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of our study was to investigate the potential association of mRNA expression and plasma levels of the LIM domain 7 (LMO7) gene with the pathogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Two SNPs of the LMO7 gene were genotyped in 310 patients with DCM and 415 controls. Our results showed that SNP rs7986131 (p = 0.002, OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.12-1.71), but not SNP rs4884021, was associated with DCM in the Han Chinese population. Haplotype analysis showed that the haplotype GT was associated with increased DCM susceptibility while AC was a protective haplotype. The Cox multivariate survival analysis indicated that the rs7986131 TT genotype (HR 1.659, 95% CI = 1.122-2.454, p = 0.011) was an independent multivariate predictor for shorter overall survival in patients with DCM. LMO7 mRNA expression and plasma LMO7 levels were significantly decreased in DCM (p < 0.0001). Spearman correlation test revealed that the plasma LMO7 level was negatively associated with left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (r = -0.384, p = 0.01), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = -0.375, p = 0.012), and brain natriuretic peptide (r = -0.482, p = 0.001). Our study suggested that the LMO7 gene may play an important role in the pathogenesis of DCM in the Han Chinese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available