Perceptions of healthcare providers regarding a mHealth intervention to manage COPD: a Qualitative Study (Preprint)
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Perceptions of healthcare providers regarding a mHealth intervention to manage COPD: a Qualitative Study (Preprint)
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Online
2019-05-29
DOI
10.2196/13950
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- eHealth Technologies, Multimorbidity, and the Office Visit: Qualitative Interview Study on the Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses
- (2018) Graham G Macdonald et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Barriers and enablers of COPD telerehabilitation – a frontline staff perspective
- (2018) Christina Sadolin Damhus et al. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their health care providers towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations: a qualitative study
- (2018) Y. J. G. Korpershoek et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients
- (2016) Urmimala Sarkar et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The Effect of Smartphone Interventions on Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2016) Meshari Alwashmi et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- A Mobile Phone App to Stimulate Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Development, Feasibility, and Pilot Studies
- (2016) Sigrid NW Vorrink et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Guidelines and Recommendations for Developing Interactive eHealth Apps for Complex Messaging in Health Promotion
- (2016) Kayla Joanne Heffernan et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Implementing solutions to improve and expand telehealth adoption: participatory action research in four community healthcare settings
- (2015) Johanna Taylor et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Healthcare providers’ perceptions of barriers in implementing of home telecare in Taiwan: A qualitative study
- (2015) Kuei-Feng Chiang et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- A personalised mobile-based home monitoring system for heart failure: The SUPPORT-HF Study
- (2015) Andreas Triantafyllidis et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- A Natural Walking Monitor for Pulmonary Patients Using Mobile Phones
- (2015) Joshua Juen et al. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- The Contradictions of Telehealth User Experience in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
- (2015) Lisa Brunton et al. PLoS One
- Nonadherence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients
- (2014) Bruce G. Bender CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
- Home telemonitoring in COPD: A systematic review of methodologies and patients’ adherence
- (2014) Joana Cruz et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Older adults and mobile phones for health: A review
- (2013) Jonathan Joe et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Opportunities and Challenges for Smartphone Applications in Supporting Health Behavior change: Qualitative Study
- (2013) Laura Dennison et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- MIOTIC study: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the long-term efficacy of mobile phone-based Internet of Things in the management of patients with stable COPD
- (2013) Jing Zhang et al. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Future Impact of Various Interventions on the Burden of COPD in Canada: A Dynamic Population Model
- (2012) Mehdi Najafzadeh et al. PLoS One
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started