4.5 Article

Optimizing the thickness of sputtering-Zn(O, S) buffer layer for all-dry Cd-free CIGS solar cells

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab200a

Keywords

sputtering; Zn(O, S); Cd-free; all-dry processes; CIGS solar cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61774089, 51572132, 61504067]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCZDJC31200]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1500201]
  4. Yang Fan innovative & Entrepreneurial Research Team Project [2014YT02N037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, research on the Zn(O, S) thin films as an alternative buffer layer for CIGS thin film solar cells has gained increasing popularity. The replacement of CdS and i-ZnO films by the sputtered Zn(O, S) films not only overcomes the shortcomings of using the heavy metal (Cd) and a non-vacuum production process, but also simplifies the in-line process in the industrial level. In this paper, the effects of varying the Zn(O, S) films thickness on its material properties and the corresponding device performance are investigated. At the same time, the wxAMPS simulation software is applied to studying the impact of thickness of Zn(O, S) films on the energy band structure, the built-in electric field distribution, and the generation/recombination rate of carriers. It's found that defect density in the bulk of Zn(O, S) and at the interface of CIGS/Zn(O, S) will increase with a thinner film, which further enhances interface recombination. Moreover, a deteriorated device performance is observed as a result of a very thick film, which is likely caused by the light-loss and a weaker electric field. The optimum thickness is determined based on the results of the experiment and simulation. Finally, insights are provided on reducing the defect density at the heterojunction interface in order to improve the performance of Cd-free device prepared by all-dry processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available