4.6 Article

Analysis of symbiotic microbial status of Atlantic sand dunes forest and its effects onAcacia gummiferaandRetama monosperma(Fabaceae) to be used in reforestation

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 1309-1317

Publisher

NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-019-00942-9

Keywords

Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Juniperus phoenicea; Acacia gummifera; Retama monosperma; Mycorrhizae; Rhizobia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atlantic forest natural soil flora was tested on two leguminous pioneer speciesAcacia gummiferaandRetama monospermato be used in rehabilitation programs of the coastal sand dunes forest of the Essaouira region. The rhizospheric soil of two endemic plant species:R. monospermaandJuniperus phoeniceawas sampled and split into two categories, one from native rhizospheric soil, the other of the sterilized rhizospheric soil. Investigation was focused on mycorrhizal formations, but other forms of beneficial symbiosis such as rhizobia and viable soil microflora were also studied. Growth and nutrition variables assessed included lengths of roots and shoots, number of branches, ratio of root to shoot dry mass and water, nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Results showed important mycorrhizal associations in roots of both plants, presence of nodules and abundance of viable soil microflora.J. phoeniceahad a 100% frequency of mycorrhizal formation and an intensity of 80% compared to a frequency of 80% and intensity of 54% forR. monosperma.Nodules had the same density of CFU regardless of the origin. Abundance of viable microflora in rhisospheric soil ofR. monosperma, J. phoeniceaand the control differed significantly. Among the studied variables forA. gummiferaandR. monosperma, nitrogen and phosphorus uptakes significantly wit the use of the nonsterilized rhizospheric soil. Both species doubled their phosphorus uptake when colonized by mycorrhizal species,R. monospermadoubled its nitrogen uptake andA. gummiferaincreased it by seven times compared with the control. No significant difference was noted for the other variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available