4.6 Review

Recent experimental and theoretical studies on Al siting/acid site distribution in zeolite framework

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 146-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2019.04.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0604802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573270, 21603254, 21773281, 21802157, 21875275]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21020500]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China [2015021003]
  5. East-West Cooperation Project of Ningxia Key R D Plan [2017BY063]
  6. Innovative Talent Program of Shanxi Province [201605D211001]
  7. CAS-SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  8. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2016161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The catalytic performance of zeolite is significantly influenced by the steric constraints and acid property of its active acid sites that resulted from the isomorphous substitution of aluminum (Al) for silicon (Si) in lattice sites. A clear understanding on the relationship of synthesis-Al distribution-catalytic property would be beneficial to the design of zeolite catalyst with desirable acid site distribution for specific reactions. Therefore, recent experimental and theoretical research progresses on the control of Al siting or acid site distribution in zeolite framework are reviewed here with the focus on the effects of gel compositions, including structure-directing agents, Si/Al sources, charge-balance cations and heteroatoms, which are investigated by various spectroscopy techniques, for example, Si-29 and Al-27 MQ/MAS NMR spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance (DR) UV-vis spectroscopy of Co-exchanged samples and extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy, model catalytic tests and DFT calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available