4.6 Article

IoT Implementation of Kalman Filter to Improve Accuracy of Air Quality Monitoring and Prediction

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9091831

Keywords

air quality; edge computing; high accuracy; IoT; Kalman Filter; prediction; Raspberry Pi

Funding

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2018A030313340]
  2. Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, China [2014KQNCX154]
  3. Technology Development Project of Guangdong Province [2017A010101034]
  4. Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2016KTSCX141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to obtain high-accuracy measurements, traditional air quality monitoring and prediction systems adopt high-accuracy sensors. However, high-accuracy sensors are accompanied with high cost, which cannot be widely promoted in Internet of Things (IoT) with many sensor nodes. In this paper, we propose a low-cost air quality monitoring and real-time prediction system based on IoT and edge computing, which reduces IoT applications dependence on cloud computing. Raspberry Pi with computing power, as an edge device, runs the Kalman Filter (KF) algorithm, which improves the accuracy of low-cost sensors by 27% on the edge side. Based on the KF algorithm, our proposed system achieves the immediate prediction of the concentration of six air pollutants such as SO2, NO2 and PM2.5 by combining the observations with errors. In the comparison experiments with three common predicted algorithms including Simple Moving Average, Exponentially Weighted Moving Average and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, the KF algorithm can obtain the optimal prediction results, and root-mean-square error decreases by 68.3% on average. Taken together, the results of the study indicate that our proposed system, combining edge computing and IoT, can be promoted in smart agriculture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available