4.1 Article

Characteristics of impervious surface and its effect on direct runoff: a case study in a rapidly urbanized area

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 1885-1891

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2019.064

Keywords

boosted regression trees; direct runoff; hydrological response; impervious surface; urbanization

Funding

  1. China National RD Program [2017YFC0505704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871192, 41771200, 31600372]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, many cities have experienced serious urban flood and non-point pollution issues due to hydrological process changes in rapidly urbanizing areas. Understanding the relationship between impervious surface and direct runoff is important for urban planning to protect the urban hydrological system. In this study, we used a mixed spectral decomposition method to interpret the long-term series of impervious surface of Shenyang, China. Direct runoff was evaluated by an improved SCS-CN (Soil Conservation Service curve number) model, and the relative influences of five underlying surface factors on the direct runoff of each period were analyzed by boosted regression trees. The overall impervious area was significantly increased in both the study area and built-up area from 1984 to 2015. The impervious ratio showed a decreasing trend in the built-up area and increasing trend in the whole study area. The runoff coefficient of the built-up area showed a significantly decreasing trend. The runoff ratio of the built-up area to the whole study area was increased dramatically, reaching 0.26 by 2015. NDVI (normalized distribution vegetation index), vegetation, and impervious surface were the most important urban surface conditions in the study area for direct runoff generation. The relative influence of impervious surface showed a rapidly increasing trend and then gradually decreased from 2000.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available