4.7 Review

Are Fruit Juices Healthier Than Sugar-Sweetened Beverages? A Review

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11051006

Keywords

free sugars; fruit juices; fructose; high-fructose corn syrup; sugar-sweetened beverages; dyslipidemia

Funding

  1. Canada Graduate Scholarship
  2. National Institute of Health (United States) [1R01HL121324, 1R01HL137716]
  3. Research Chair in Physical and Mental Comorbidities from the Institut du savoir Montfort (Canada) [2016-018-Chair-PIMB]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2014-03748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Free sugars overconsumption is associated with an increased prevalence of risk factors for metabolic diseases such as the alteration of the blood lipid levels. Natural fruit juices have a free sugar composition quite similar to that of sugar-sweetened beverages. Thus, could fruit juice consumption lead to the same adverse effects on health as sweetened beverages? We attempted to answer this question by reviewing the available evidence on the health effects of both sugar-sweetened beverages and natural fruit juices. We determined that, despite the similarity of fruits juices to sugar-sweetened beverages in terms of free sugars content, it remains unclear whether they lead to the same metabolic consequences if consumed in equal dose. Important discrepancies between studies, such as type of fruit juice, dose, duration, study design, and measured outcomes, make it impossible to provide evidence-based public recommendations as to whether the consumption of fruit juices alters the blood lipid profile. More randomized controlled trials comparing the metabolic effects of fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption are needed to shape accurate public health guidelines on the variety and quantity of free sugars in our diet that would help to prevent the development of obesity and related health problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available