4.8 Article

A defined mechanistic correlate of protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in non-human primates

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09894-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University Challenge Seed Fund (Oxford University Innovation)
  2. Wellcome Trust [201477/Z/16/Z, 106917/Z/15/Z, 206194]
  3. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  4. Intramural Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  5. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) iCASE PhD Studentship [MR/K017632/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [201477/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001020] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malaria vaccine design and prioritization has been hindered by the lack of a mechanistic correlate of protection. We previously demonstrated a strong association between protection and merozoite-neutralizing antibody responses following vaccination of non-human primates against Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5). Here, we test the mechanism of protection. Using mutant human IgG1 Fc regions engineered not to engage complement or FcR-dependent effector mechanisms, we produce merozoite-neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-PfRH5 chimeric monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and perform a passive transfer-P. falciparum challenge study in Aotus nancymaae monkeys. At the highest dose tested, 6/6 animals given the neutralizing PfRH5-binding mAb c2AC7 survive the challenge without treatment, compared to 0/6 animals given non-neutralizing PfRH5-binding mAb c4BA7 and 0/6 animals given an isotype control mAb. Our results address the controversy regarding whether merozoite-neutralizing antibody can cause protection against P. falciparum blood-stage infections, and highlight the quantitative challenge of achieving such protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available