4.5 Article

A novel hybrid publication recommendation system using compound information

Journal

WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 2499-2517

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11280-019-00687-9

Keywords

Publication recommendation; Compound information; Edge-reinforced citation network; Citation network cluster

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61632016, 61572336, 61572335, 61772356]
  2. Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution [17KJA520003, 18KJA520010]
  3. Open Program of Neusoft Corporation [SKLSAOP1801]
  4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [FCC/1/1976-19-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Publication recommendation is an interesting but challenging research problem. Most existing studies only use partial information of papers' contents, reference network or co-author relationship, which leads to an unsatisfied recommendation result. In this study, we propose a novel hybrid publication recommendation approach using compound information which retrieves top-K most relevant papers from a publication depository for a set of user input keywords. Our advantages comparing to the existing methods include: (1) Reaching a better recommendation results by taking the advantages of both content-based recommendation and citation-based recommendation and exploring much richer information of papers in one method; (2) Effectively solving the cold-start problem for new published papers by considering the vitality of papers and the impact factor of venues into the citation network; (3) Saving a large overhead in calculating the content-based similarity between papers and user input keywords by doing paper clustering based on the citation network. Extensive experiments on DBLP and Microsoft Academic datasets demonstrate that PubTeller improves the state-of-the-art methods with 4% in Precision and 4.5% in Recall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available