4.7 Article

In situ generation of hydrophobic magnetic ionic liquids in stir bar dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with headspace gas chromatography

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages 420-428

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.071

Keywords

Magnetic ionic liquids; In situ stir bar dispersive liquid-liquid; microextraction; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Organic pollutants

Funding

  1. Chemical Measurement and Imaging Program at the National Science Foundation [CHE-1709372]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the first time, an in situ stir bar dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction approach has been developed and coupled with headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of a group of organic pollutants. The method exploits a new generation of magnetic ionic liquids (MILs) that contain paramagnetic cations based on Ni2+ or Co2+ metal centers coordinated with either N-butylimidazole or N-octylimidazole ligands and chloride anions. The reactants are added to an aqueous solution containing a high field neodymium rod magnet, followed by the addition of the bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide anion that promotes a metathesis reaction for the in situ generation of a hydrophobic MIL. Concurrently, a high stirring rate is maintained to exceed the magnetic field of the rod magnet and disperse the generated MIL in the sample solution. When stirring is stopped, the MIL coats the rod magnet due to its paramagnetic nature, facilitating the MIL transfer and subsequent desorption and analysis. Under optimum conditions, the method required a 2.5-18% (w/v) aqueous solution of sodium chloride, 10 mL of sample, 20 or 30 mg of MIL, the addition of a small volume of dispersive solvent, and stirring for 5-7.5 min, depending on the MIL. The method provided limits of detection (LODs) down to 10 mu g L-1, adequate reproducibility (with relative standard deviation values lower than 10% for a spiked level of 80 mu g L-1), and relative recoveries between 72.5% and 102%. Furthermore, the method was successfully applied in the analysis of tap and mineral water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available