4.7 Article

Reconstructing seismic response demands across multiple tall buildings using kernel-based machine learning methods

Journal

STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2359

Keywords

machine learning; rapid damage assessment; seismic instrumentation and monitoring; seismic response demands; tall building clusters

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) [1538866]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1538866] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An approach to reconstructing full-profile seismic response demands across multiple tall buildings, using kernel-based machine learning methods, is introduced. Nonlinear response history analyses are used to generate a dataset of peak floor accelerations and peak story drift ratios for a portfolio of tall buildings, using spatially explicit ground motions from the Northridge earthquake. Structural dissimilarities are incorporated by including a range of building heights and differences in the type and combination of lateral force resisting systems. Using measurements from limited locations within a subset of buildings, the full-profile response demands for all buildings in a portfolio are reconstructed. A rigorous evaluation procedure is used to demonstrate the ability of the kernel-based methods to accurately capture the highly nonlinear response demand patterns within and across buildings. For a scenario where the first floor, mid-height, and roof level responses are known for 40% of the buildings, the kernel-based machine learning methods are able to estimate the full-profile demands of the entire portfolio with a median error that is approximately 30% of the measured demands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available