4.7 Article

Efficient novel amphiphilic double shells layer coupled with nanoscale zero-valent composite for the degradation of trichloroethylene

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 659, Issue -, Pages 821-827

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.301

Keywords

CDSN; Trichloroethylene; Oxidation resistance; Strong adsorption; Groundwater remediation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708223, 41301329]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [17DZ1202304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An efficient novel amphiphilic material composed of core-double shells nanocomposite (CDSN) with nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) as the core and PS100-b-PAA(16) as inner shell and chitosan as outmost shell has been synthesized successfully. Its application to remove the trichloroethylene (TCE) in stimulated TCE solution with 7.3 +/- 0.3 mg/L dissolved oxygen was investigated. The results showed that CDSN after exposure to air for a month could still remove 92.6% of TCE as compared to 61.5% removal rate of NZVI in 360min (the gram ratio of material: TCE equals to 10: 1), exhibiting the great oxidation resistance performance. Specifically, dynamic research of the total removal divided into adsorption by shell layer and degradation by reducibility of NZVI at a predetermined interval was engaged to understand the complete mass transfer process of TCE. The results revealed that CDSN adsorbed 1.5 to 2 folds time TCE as compared to NZVI in the same initial pH=8.5 aqueous solution. Importantly, CDSN could sustain fixed reactivity to remove about 94.8% of TCE from the start to end. NZVI exhibited greater removal capacity in first 180 min, but later it lost the reducibility and finial removal rate was 89%. The selective adsorption to protonated CDSN was strengthened to increase the removal of TCE at pH 3.5 while NZVI had a worse removal in pH 3.5 performance than pH 8.5. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available