- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
RISK ANALYSIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-05-02
DOI
10.1111/risa.13325
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries
- (2018) E. Keith Smith et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power
- (2017) Bernadette Sütterlin et al. ENERGY POLICY
- The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
- (2017) Christine Merk et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- The Origin and Role of Trust in Local Policy Elites’ Perceptions of High-Voltage Power Line Installations in the State of Arkansas
- (2016) Creed Tumlison et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Weighing the Risks of Nuclear Energy and Climate Change: Trust in Different Information Sources, Perceived Risks, and Willingness to Pay for Alternatives to Nuclear Power
- (2016) Annukka Vainio et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed
- (2016) Jing Shi et al. Nature Climate Change
- Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster
- (2015) Norifumi Tsujikawa et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Predicting Vaccination Intention and Benefit and Risk Perceptions: The Incorporation of Affect, Trust, and Television Influence in a Dual-Mode Model
- (2015) Nien-Tsu Nancy Chen RISK ANALYSIS
- Why have some people changed their attitudes toward nuclear power after the accident in Fukushima?
- (2014) Michael Siegrist et al. ENERGY POLICY
- Examining Public Trust in Risk-Managing Organizations After a Major Disaster
- (2014) Kazuya Nakayachi RISK ANALYSIS
- Risk Perceptions and Trust Following the 2010 and 2011 Icelandic Volcanic Ash Crises
- (2014) J. Richard Eiser et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Understanding Public Perceptions of Benefits and Risks of Childhood Vaccinations in the United States
- (2013) Geoboo Song RISK ANALYSIS
- The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
- (2012) Gisela Wachinger et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster
- (2012) Vivianne H. M. Visschers et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
- (2012) Dan M. Kahan et al. Nature Climate Change
- Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model
- (2011) Vivianne H.M. Visschers et al. ENERGY POLICY
- The Power of Association: Its Impact on Willingness to Buy GM Food
- (2011) Melanie Connor et al. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
- Affective Imagery and Acceptance of Replacing Nuclear Power Plants
- (2011) Carmen Keller et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior
- (2011) Teun Terpstra RISK ANALYSIS
- Trust, Confidence, Procedural Fairness, Outcome Fairness, Moral Conviction, and the Acceptance of GM Field Experiments
- (2011) Michael Siegrist et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- A Cross-Cultural Study of Perceived Benefit Versus Risk as Mediators in the Trust-Acceptance Relationship
- (2011) Nicolás C. Bronfman et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Impact of Knowledge and Misconceptions on Benefit and Risk Perception of CCS
- (2010) Lasse Wallquist et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Fixing the communications failure
- (2010) Dan Kahan NATURE
- The Intuitive Detection Theorist (IDT) Model of Trust in Hazard Managers
- (2010) Mathew P. White et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Risk and Benefit Perceptions of Mobile Phone and Base Station Technology in Bangladesh
- (2010) Ellen Van Kleef et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Trust and Confidence: The Difficulties in Distinguishing the Two Concepts in Research
- (2010) Michael Siegrist RISK ANALYSIS
- Distinguishing Trust from Confidence: Manageable Difficulties, Worth the Effort Reply to: Trust and Confidence: The Difficulties in Distinguishing the Two Concepts in Research
- (2010) Timothy C. Earle RISK ANALYSIS
- Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?
- (2010) Michael Greenberg et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research
- (2010) Timothy C. Earle RISK ANALYSIS
- The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception
- (2009) Stephen C. Whitfield et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- The Role of Similarity Cues in the Development of Trustin Sources of Information About GM Food
- (2009) Anneloes Meijnders et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Competence-Based and Integrity-Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS)
- (2009) Bart W. Terwel et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- The Role of Trust in the Affective Evaluation of Novel Risks: The Case of CO2Storage
- (2009) Cees J. H. Midden et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food and Newspaper Coverage of Food Safety Issues: A Longitudinal Perspective
- (2009) Janneke de Jonge et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Public Trust in Government Concerning Tobacco Control in Japan
- (2009) Kazuya Nakayachi et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology
- (2008) Dan M. Kahan et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Attitudes as an Expression of Knowledge and “Political Anchoring”: The Case of Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom
- (2008) Joan Costa-Font et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- On the Relation Between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management
- (2008) Timothy C. Earle et al. RISK ANALYSIS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started