4.5 Article

Degradation and leaching of bentazone, terbuthylazine and S-metolachlor and some of their metabolites: A long-term lysimeter experiment

Journal

PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages 273-281

Publisher

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/803/2018-PSE

Keywords

agriculture; herbicide; contamination; metabolism

Categories

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund
  2. National Public Funding Project MURMAN [4300-762/2010/7]
  3. Federal Ministry of Sustainability and Tourism, Vienna, Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The degradation and leaching of bentazone, terbuthylazine and S-metolachlor and their metabolites N-methyl-bentazone, desethyl-terbuthylazine, 2-hydroxy-terbuthylazine, metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid (ESA) and metolachlor oxanilic acid (OA) were investigated using the plant protection products Artett (bentazone/terbuthylazine), Gardo Gold (S-metolachlor/terbuthylazine) and Dual Gold (S-metolachlor) applied to a weighable, monolithic, high precision lysimeter with a loamy, sandy soil. Artett and Gardo Gold were applied at higher doses than recommended according to good agricultural practice. In leachate, S-metolachlor was detected at concentrations of up to 0.15 mu g/L, whereas metolachlor-ESA and metolachlor-OA were present at higher concentrations of up to 37 mu g/L and 8.4 mu g/L, respectively. In a second terbuthylazine application, concentrations of desethyl-terbuthylazine of up to 0.1 mu g/L, were detected. In soil, bentazone degraded faster than terbuthylazine and S-metolachlor, whereas the metabolization of terbuthylazine after the second application resulted in an enhanced formation of desethyl-terbuthylazine and a highly increased hydroxylation of terbuthylazine. The importance of analysing both parent compounds and metabolites on a long-term scale was demonstrated to better understand the environmental fate and transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available