4.7 Article

Block versus Random Amphiphilic Glycopolymer Nanopaticles as Glucose-Responsive Vehicles

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 3345-3356

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51173085, 21474055]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China [14JYBJC29400]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130031110014]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT1257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To explore the effect of polymer structure on their self-assembled aggregates and their unique characteristics, this study was devoted to developing a series of amphiphilic block and random phenylboronic acid-based glycopolymers by RAFT polymerization. The amphiphilic glycopolymers were successfully self-assembled into spherically shaped nanoparticles with narrow size distribution in aqueous solution. For block and random copolymers with similar monomer compositions, block copolymer nanoparticles exhibited a more regular transmittance change with the increasing glucose level, while a more evident variation of size and quicker decreasing tendency in I/I-0 behavior in different glucose media were observed for random copolymer nanoparticles. Cell viability of all the polymer nanoparticles investigated by MTT assay was higher than 80%, indicating that both block and random copolymers had good cytocompatibility. Insulin could be encapsulated into both nanoparticles, and insulin release rate for random glycopolymer was slightly quicker than that for the block ones. We speculate that different chain conformations between block and random glycopolymers play an important role in self-assembled nanoaggregates and underlying glucose-sensitive behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available