4.0 Article

Nearly Mode I Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Delamination Propagation in a Multidirectional Laminate Fabricated by a Wet-Layup

Journal

PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 107-140

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S1029959919020036

Keywords

constant amplitude; fatigue delamination growth rate; fiber reinforced composites; fracture toughness; resistance curve; R-ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five double cantilever beam specimens were tested quasi-statically to obtain a G(IR) resistance curve. In addition, nine double cantilever beam specimens were tested in fatigue to obtain a Paris-type relation to describe the delamination propagation rate da/dN where a is delamination length and N is the cycle number. Displacement ratios of R-d = 0.10 and 0.48 were used for five and four specimens, respectively. The specimens were fabricated by means of a wet-layup process from carbon fiber reinforced polymer plies. The interface containing the delamination was between a unidirectional fabric and a woven ply. The fracture toughness and fatigue delamination propagation protocols are outlined. The mechanical and thermal residual stress intensity factors were obtained by means of finite element analyses and the conservative M-integral along the delamination front. They were superposed to determine the total stress intensity factors. It was found that the total mode I stress intensity factor dominates the other two stress intensity factors. Thus, nearly mode I deformation was achieved. Interpolation expressions for the mechanical and thermal residual stress intensity factors were determined using three and two-dimensional fittings, respectively. Results are presented with an expression for G(IR) determined. Moreover, the fatigue data is described including threshold values and master-curves. These results shed light on the behavior of delamination propagation in multidirectional laminate composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available