4.6 Article

Determination of trace heavy metal elements in aqueous solution using surface-enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 15091-15099

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.015091

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61575073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy metal pollution is one of the main problems in water pollution which is harmful to humans. Surface-enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (SENLIBS) has been applied to detect trace amounts of heavy metal elements in aqueous solution; however. it is still a big challenge to explore the relationship between the LIBS detection sensitivity and the substrate's physical properties. In this work four typical substrates, zinc (Zn), magnesium alloy (Mg), nickel (Ni), and silicon (Si); were compared; and the mechanism of spectral enhancement by different substrates in SENLIBS was investigated. The results indicated that the limit of detection (LoD) of heavy metal elements on different substrates is positively proportional to the boiling of the substrate. That is mainly because a higher plasma excitation temperature and electron density are obtained; leading to more intense collision between particles. The signal enhancement is associated with the lower boiling point of the substrate (corresponding to a lower ablation threshold and higher ablation quantity from the substrate). As a result, the best LoD was 0.0011 mg/L for chromium (Cr) and 0.004 mg/L for lead (Pb) on an optimal Zn substrate, respectively. The LoDs were sufficiently low to meet the drinking water sanitation standard. These results showed that the detection sensitivity of heavy metal elements in aqueous solution can be improved by choosing a substrate with a lower boiling point in SENLIBS. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available