4.8 Article

Generally applicable transcriptome-wide analysis of translation using anota2seq

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz223

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  4. Wallenberg Academy Fellows Program
  5. STRATCAN grants
  6. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP-363027]
  7. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA 202021-01-A1]
  8. Joint Canada-Israel Health Research Program (JCIHRP) [108589-001]
  9. Department of Health and Human Services acting through theVictorian Cancer Agency [MCRF16007]
  10. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1141339]
  11. Vetenskapsradet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

mRNA translation plays an evolutionarily conserved role in homeostasis and when dysregulated contributes to various disorders including metabolic and neurological diseases and cancer. Notwithstanding that optimal and universally applicable methods are critical for understanding the complex role of translational control under physiological and pathological conditions, approaches to analyze translatomes are largely underdeveloped. To address this, we developed the anota2seq algorithm which outperforms current methods for statistical identification of changes in translation. Notably, in contrast to available analytical methods, anota2seq also allows specific identification of an underappreciated mode of gene expression regulation whereby translation acts as a buffering mechanism which maintains protein levels despite fluctuations in corresponding mRNA abundance (translational buffering'). Thus, the universal anota2seq algorithm allows efficient and hitherto unprecedented interrogation of translatomes which is anticipated to advance knowledge regarding the role of translation in homeostasis and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available