4.8 Article

Nonsense mutation-dependent reinitiation of translation in mammalian cells

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 6330-6338

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz319

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [678461]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [807/15]
  3. H2020 ERC grant
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [678461] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In-frame stop codons mark the termination of translation. However, post-termination ribosomes can reinitiate translation at downstream AUG codons. In mammals, reinitiation is most efficient when the termination codon is positioned close to the 5 '-proximal initiation site and around 78 bases upstream of the reinitiation site. The phenomenon was studied mainly in the context of open reading frames (ORFs) found within the 5 '-untranslated region, or polycicstronic viral mRNA. We hypothesized that reinitiation of translation following nonsense mutations within the main ORF of p53 can promote the expression of N-truncated p53 isoforms such as Delta 40, Delta 133and Delta 160p53. Here, we report that expression of all known N-truncated p53 isoforms by reinitiation is mechanistically feasible, including expression of the previously unidentified variant Delta 66p53. Moreover, we found that significant reinitiation of translation can be promoted by nonsense mutations located even 126 codons downstream of the 5 '-proximal initiation site, and observed when the reinitiation site is positioned between 6 and 243 bases downstream of the nonsense mutation. We also demonstrate that reinitiation can stabilise p53 mRNA transcripts with a premature termination codon, by allowing such transcripts to evade the nonsense mediated decay pathway. Our data suggest that the expression of N-truncated proteins from alleles carrying a premature termination codon is more prevalent than previously thought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available