4.7 Article

Maximising BOLD sensitivity through automated EPI protocol optimisation

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 159-170

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.052

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [602186]
  2. Wellcome Trust [091593/Z/10/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gradient echo echo-planar imaging (GE EPI) is used for most fMRI studies but can suffer substantially from image distortions and BOLD sensitivity (BS) loss due to susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. While there are various post-processing methods for correcting image distortions, signal dropouts cannot be recovered and therefore need to be addressed at the data acquisition stage. Common approaches for reducing susceptibility-related BS loss in selected brain areas are: z-shimming, inverting the phase encoding (PE) gradient polarity, optimizing the slice tilt and increasing spatial resolution. The optimization of these parameters can be based on atlases derived from multiple echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisitions. However, this requires resource and time, which imposes a practical limitation on the range over which parameters can be optimised meaning that the chosen settings may still be sub-optimal. To address this issue, we have developed an automated method that can be used to optimize across a large parameter space. It is based on numerical signal simulations of the BS loss predicted by physical models informed by a large database of magnetic field (B-0) maps acquired on a broad cohort of participants. The advantage of our simulation-based approach compared to previous methods is that it saves time and expensive measurements and allows for optimizing EPI protocols by incorporating a broad range of factors, including different resolutions, echo times or slice orientations. To verify the numerical optimisation, results are compared to those from an earlier study and to experimental BS measurements carried out in six healthy volunteers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available